In collaboration with Payame Noor University and Iranian Society of Physiology and Pharmacology

Document Type : Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Science and Technology, University of Hormozgan, Post Box: 3995 Bandar Abbas, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Physical Oceanography, Faculty of Marine Science and Technology, University of Hormozgan, Post Box: 3995 Bandar Abbas, Iran

Abstract


Sea urchin as a bioerosion, is an effective factors on coral reef ecosystems which the observable biometry of urchin and its relationship with the jaw is important. Therefore, within this survey, sea urchin Echinometra mathaei were examined for summertime (July–September, 2014) between the intertidal areas of Dayyer Port (51˚53’49.39ʼ’E, 27˚50ʼ3.57’’N), Iran. A total of 91 individuals lively transferred to a lab. Total wet weight was weighted by a digital scale and the test height and diameters and the jaw length was measured by caliper (0.01 precision). The relationships between heights and diameters with weights were calculated according to indices and the relationships between the jaw lengths and test height and diameter were achieved. The results illustrated that the relationship between test height to its diameter (HDR index) is independent of test diameter (the slop near to zero) and therefore, there is a direct relationship between test height and diameter (a=0.47). Although the highest values of test height and spin length refer to males, but females achieved bigger values of test diameter, height and thickness (mean test height, diameter and thickness of females were 24.13±3.52 mm,  44.93±5.71 mm, 0.83±0.16 mm; and  males: 21.22±6.82 mm, 37.67±12.27 mm, and  0.73±0.20 mm, respectively). The test diameter and weight of immature samples were less than 20 mm and 6.66 gr, respectively where can be as a primary criterion of Echinometra mathaei sexual maturity. Two indices HWR and DWR of both females and males had obvious differences with total samples, which also can be related to immature samples. Moreover, the jaw length was half of height (a=0.49, r=0.87) and a quarter of diameter (a=0.25, r=0.89). Results also illustrated well that larger samples had longer jaws that it could help identifying higher erosive samples.
 

Keywords

Amemiya, C.T.; Miyake, T.; Rast, J.P.; (2005). Echinoderms. Current Biology; 15(23): R944-R946.
Aslian, H.A.; (2014). Antibacterial activity of various extracts of the sea urchin Echinometra mathaei. University of Hormozgan. Bandar Abbas, Iran; 48-49.
Blainville, H.M.D.D.; (1825). Oursin, Echinus (Actinozoaires.). Pp. 59-98 in Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles F.G. Levrault, Strasbourg & Paris., available online at http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/81570#page/5/mode/1up page(s): 94.
Bronstein, O.; Loya, Y.; (2014). Echinoid community structure and rates of herbivory and bioerosion on exposed and sheltered reefs. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology; 456: 8-17.
Coppard, S.E.; Campbell, A.C.; (2006). Taxonomic significance of test morphology in the echinoid genera Diadema Gray, 1825 and Echinothrix Peters, 1853 (Echinodermata). Zoosystema; 28(1): 93-112.
Dafni, J.; (1980). Abnormal growth patterns in the sea urchin Tripneustes cf. gratilla (L.) under pollution (Echinodermata, Echinoidea). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology; 47(3): 259-279.
Dumas, P.; Kulbicki, M.; Chifflet, S.; Fichez, R.; Ferraris, J. (2007). Environmental factors influencing urchin spatial distributions on disturbed coral reefs (New Caledonia, South Pacific). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology; 344(1): 88-100.
Ebert, T.A.; Hernández, J.C.; Clemente, S.; (2014). Annual reversible plasticity of feeding structures: cyclical changes of jaw allometry in a sea urchin. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences; 281(1779): 20132284.
Elliott, L.; Russell, M.; Hernández, J.; (2012). Estimating Echinoid test volume from height and diameter measurements. In Johnson C. (ed) Proceedings of the Thirteenth  International Echinoderm Conference, University of Tasmania, Hobart Tasmania, 59 January 2009. Echinoderms in a Changing World. CRC Press, pp. 105-112.
Gambardella, C.; Aluigi, M.G.; Ferrando, S.; Gallus, L.; Ramoino, P.; Gatti, A.M.; Rottigni, M.; Falugi, C.; (2013). Developmental abnormalities and changes in cholinesterase activity in sea urchin embryos and larvae from sperm exposed to engineered nanoparticles. Aquatic Toxicology; 130: 77-85.
Hagen, N.T.; (2008). Enlarged lantern size in similar-sized, sympatric, sibling species of Strongylocentrotid sea urchins: from phenotypic accommodation to functional adaptation for durophagy. Marine Biology; 153(5): 907-924.
Macfarlane, K..; (2007). Distribution of the benthic marine habitats in the northern region of the West Coast of Dominica. Institute of Tropical Marine Ecology Research: 20: 30-48.
Marin, A.; Montoya, S.; Vita R.; Marín-Guirao, L.; Lloret, J. Aguado, F.; (2007). Utility of sea urchin embryo-larval bioassays for assessing the environmental impact of marine fishcage farming. Aquaculture; 271(1), 286-297.
McCartney M.A.; Keller G.; Lessois H.A.; (2000). Dispersal barriers in tropical oceans and speciation in Atlantic and eastern Pacific sea urchins of the genus Echinometra. Molecular Ecology; 9: 1391-1400.
McClanahan, T.R.; Muthiga, N.A.; (2013). Echinometra. In: Lawrence J.M. (ed) Sea Urchin: Biology and Ecology. Florida, MA: Academic Press, pp. 337-353.
Meidel, S.; Scheibling, R.E.; (1999). Effects of food type and ration on reproductive maturation and growth of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. Marine Biology; 134(1), 155-166.
Mohebbi, GH.; Vazirizadeh, A.; Nabipour I.; (2016). Sea urchin: toxinology, bioactive compounds and its treatment management. Iran South Medical Journal; 19(4): 704-735.
Mortensen, T.; (1943). A Monograph of the echinoidea III. 2: camarodonta. I. orthopsidae, glyphocyphidae, temnopleuridae and toxopneustidae text.
Padilla-Gamiño, J.L.; Kelly, M.W.; Evans, T.G.; Hofmann, G.E.; (2013). Temperature and CO2 additively regulate physiology, morphology and genomic responses of larval sea urchins, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Proceedings of the Royal Society. Series B: Biological Sciences; 280: 20130155.
Pecorino, D.; Lamare, M.D.; Barker, M.F.; (2012). Growth, morphometrics and size structure of the Diadematidae sea urchin Centrostephanus rodgersii in northern New Zealand. Marine and Freshwater Research; 63(7): 624-634.
Pederson, H.G.; Johnson, C.R.; (2008). Growth and age structure of sea urchins (Heliocidaris erythrogramma) in complex barrens and native macroalgal beds in eastern Tasmania. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil; 65(1): 1-11.
Rogers-Bennett, L.; Rogers, D.W.;  Bennett, W.A.;  Ebert, T.A.;  (2003). Modeling red sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus) growth using six growth functions. Fishery Bulletin; 101: 614-626.
Sadripour, E.; Mortazavi, M.; Mahdavi Shahri, N.; (2013). Effects of mercury on embryonic development and larval growth of the sea urchin Echinometra mathaei from the Persian Gulf. Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences; 12(4), 898-907.
Siikavuopio, S.I.; (2009). Green sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, Mülle) in aquaculture: the effects of environmental factors on gonad growth. Ph.D. thesis. University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway.
Zhao, C.; Zhang, W.; Chang, Y.; Liu, P.; (2010). Test and gonad characteristics in different genders of cultivated sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus intermedius, Agassiz): First insight into sexual identification, African Journal of Biotechnology; 9(44): 7560-7563.