Abbas Ashoori; HOSSEIN VARASTEH MORADI; Farhad Hosseini Tayefeh
Abstract
Anzali International Wetland is one of the most important bird sites in Iran and the region, but so far no comprehensive study has been conducted to determine the diversity and status of its birds. In this study, all parts of the wetland were monitored monthly from January 2014 to December 2015 with ...
Read More
Anzali International Wetland is one of the most important bird sites in Iran and the region, but so far no comprehensive study has been conducted to determine the diversity and status of its birds. In this study, all parts of the wetland were monitored monthly from January 2014 to December 2015 with the aim of identifying and surveying the status of the birds in the wetland. A total of 243 bird species including 112 waterbirds and 131 terrestrial species were identified. The highest number of species was recorded in April and the lowest number in June, and more than 70% of the birds in the wetland were passage and wintering migrants. The highest number of birds was counted in January (134,167 individuals) and the lowest number in May (6,979 individuals). Twenty-six percent of the birds were globally threatened, near-threatened and nationally protected in Iran, and nine species of were named: Sociable Lapwing in the critically endangered, White-headed Duck, Saker Falcon and Steppe Eagle in the endangered, and Common Pochard, Horned Grebe, Greater Spotted Eagle, Eastern Imperial Eagle and European Turtle Dove in the vulnerable category. Breeding of Ferruginous Duck, Savi’s Warbler, Little Crake and Little Tern was recorded for the first time in this wetland and more than one percent of the global population of Whiskered Tern, Teal, Mallard, Gadwall, Whooper Swan, Pygmy Cormorant, Great cormorant and Dalmatian Pelican occur in this wetland. This study shows that Anzali wetland, despite being included in the Ramsar Convention’s Montreux Record of listed sites experiencing change in ecological character, is still one of the most important sites for birds, especially waterbirds, and still satisfies all the waterbird-related criteria of the Ramsar Convention. Therefore, maintaining the quality and extent of the wetland and its valuable habitats is essential.
Abbas Ashoori; Masoud Yousefi; Farhad Hosseini Tayefeh
Abstract
Waterbirds are among the most vulnerable species of birds, and their species richness and population size are important indicators of the quality and conservation value of aquatic ecosystems. The populations of waterbirds are severely in decline, and in recent years more species have been added to the ...
Read More
Waterbirds are among the most vulnerable species of birds, and their species richness and population size are important indicators of the quality and conservation value of aquatic ecosystems. The populations of waterbirds are severely in decline, and in recent years more species have been added to the IUCN Red List. It is therefore imperative that the populations of these birds be monitored and protected. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the trends in the diversity and density of wintering migratory waterbirds in four protected areas in the Anzali International Wetland Complex, namely Selkeh, Sorkhankol, Choukam and Siahkieshim. To this end, data from the mid-winter census during a 10-year period (2003-2005 and 2008-2013) were used. We also compared the similarity of waterbird communities among the four protected areas using the Morista Index and PCA test. In total, 65 species of waterbirds were identified in all of these four areas of the wetland. Selkeh had the highest species richness (57 species) and Siahkeshim had the highest mean abundance (31,504 individuals). Also the highest abundance of these four areas combined was in 2013 (103,332 individuals) and the lowest was in 2005 (42,842 individuals). Anatidae were represented by the highest number of species (18 species) and Threskiornithidae and Sternidae families were lowest with one species each. The results of Morista Index and PCA test also revealed that, Sorkhankol wildlife refuge had the least similarity with the other protected areas based on species richness. The results suggest the importance of the Sorkhankol area for providing habitats and supporting diving waterbird species, in particular its value for diving ducks. So, this part of Anzali Wetland may need to be protected more than before. Implementation of comprehensive wetland management plans and establishment of integrated ecosystem management systems are among the most important strategies for preserving these four areas for aquatic birds and overwintering.
Aliasghar Zarei; Maziar Mahmoudi
Abstract
Abstract
One step in wildlife management is knowing as target population density and that is required cognition of species dispersion pattern in landscape level. In this research, the dispersion and density of brown bear (Ursus arctos syriocus) with use of the Standardized Morisita Index (SMI) and Adaptive ...
Read More
Abstract
One step in wildlife management is knowing as target population density and that is required cognition of species dispersion pattern in landscape level. In this research, the dispersion and density of brown bear (Ursus arctos syriocus) with use of the Standardized Morisita Index (SMI) and Adaptive cluster sampling (ACS) Were determined in Arsanjan County range in Fars province. Field work and cencus of presence signs does with use random sample in 3 × 3 km cells. Total of sampeling grid in study area include 300 cells. Results SMI showed that dispersion pattern brown bear is clumped and individuals that most aggregationed in koh khom non hunting area. The Results of ACS related to active winter dens showed the brown bear density was 0.031 bear in each cell and 0.0034 bear in kilometer square. Therefor recommendation winter dens is appropriate index in evaluation brown bear population and use in density estimate this species in other areas.
Ali Asghar Zarei; Maziar Mahmoudi
Abstract
Abstract One step in wildlife management is knowing as target population density and that is required cognition of species dispersion pattern in landscape level. In this research, the dispersion and density of brown bear (Ursus arctos syriacus) with use of the Standardized Morisita Index (SMI) and Adaptive ...
Read More
Abstract One step in wildlife management is knowing as target population density and that is required cognition of species dispersion pattern in landscape level. In this research, the dispersion and density of brown bear (Ursus arctos syriacus) with use of the Standardized Morisita Index (SMI) and Adaptive cluster sampling (ACS) were determined in Arsanjan County range in Fars province. Field work and cencus of presence signs does with use random sample in 3×3 km cells. Total of sampeling grid in study area include 300 cells. Results SMI showed that dispersion pattern brown bear is clumped and individuals that most aggregationed in koh khom non hunting area. The Results of ACS related to active winter dens showed the brown bear density was 0.031 bear in each cell and 0.0034 bear in kilometer square. Therefor recommendation winter dens are appropriate index in evaluation brown bear population and use in density estimate this species in other areas.
